not logged in
| re: Just a notice | |
Posted by:  |
The_Jackster 12:49 am UTC 03/03/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Just a notice - Conas 12:43 am UTC 03/03/07 |
| You shut the fuck up! He has contributed more to the Steinman community than you have. All you have done is come here time and again, claiming to be a changed man, but in reality the same wine in new bottles. Well, the buck stops here! You insult my friend, then you've got trouble! I don't want to see you within fifty feet of these forums, and if you do say anything to Ryan off forum, well...don't open the door in East Waterford to the kid with glasses, because there will be hell to pay. > I admire your contributions to the Steinman community but > you really need to go out in Geelong and find yourself a > woman even if it means pitching money too a prostitute at > the red light district then so be it. > > > > > I have contacted Ray Fox about the issue surrounding > > "Private Of Privates". I had also kindly asked Jacqueline > > to remove all references to and surrounding the demo. > > Pudding refused to comply. > > > > Btw. thank you for crediting your sources, Mr. Pudding. > > Conveniently enough you credit everyone else but not me. > > Yet another sign of specific exclusion? After all, you > > would have to be crazy to credit the countless hard work I > > have put into my website ..:: BAT OUT OF EXCESS :: which > > I, personally, think is the most informative Steinman-site > > on the web next to DREAM POLLUTION. I will have the > > courage and the confidence to say that right now. > > > > I was given the track by Ray Fox and I, in turn, > > remastered it for Ray and Jim Steinman. I sent it to them > > last year, which they confirmed they had received (in > > turn, Pudding, Mr. Steinman congratulated me for the > > success of my "Batman" site. So much for credit...) > > > > I shared the track with several people in strictest > > confidence. I wanted their opinion because me and someone > > else were working on a new version that I'd fight to get > > potential major exposure of. Ray has supported us in all > > this. I specifically told Pudding to keep it in our > > strictest confidence which he betrayed. I told him it will > > never be available unless Ray is fully O.K. with it. Ray > > never said he was. > > > > I have spoken with him and told him everything, and he > > also has the address for the blog. I have spoken to > > Jacqueline, like I said. > > > > As for my comment "I am not afraid..." to which Tremorlor > > responded: "You will be." I now know what that implies. > > > > Look, guys, we live in a democracy. We are all equal > > people who offer our contributions to society in the best > > way that we can. I think it exactly the same in this > > community. My contribution to the Steinman community is > > just as much as valuable as everyone else here. I would > > like to see everyone to acknowledge this and not be on > > their high-horses. > > > > That includes everyone (who has not done so) thanking Dave > > for all he shared over the past year. I know there's a > > select few who haven't done so. I thank everyone for their > > contributions and I credit absolutely every one of them in > > the links page at my website. If there are any missing, > > let me know. > > > > I apologize for this upsetting incident. > > > > R.L. > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Just a notice - Conas 12:43 am UTC 03/03/07 |
| Next: | re: Just a notice - Conas 12:58 am UTC 03/03/07 |
| Thread: |
|