| re: No Wonder There Is Tension Between Jim And Meat - With Such A Cheap Publicity Stunt | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 04:12 pm UTC 02/14/10 |
| In reply to: | re: No Wonder There Is Tension Between Jim And Meat - With Such A Cheap Publicity Stunt - Rob 12:16 pm UTC 02/14/10 |
| I agree that the Meat bashing is getting boring. I now regret starting this thread. As far as Jim's private email goes, only Jim can access his email account. He is not incapable of answering Meat's emails. As Meat said, he answered Meat's emails about opera but I am guessing that Jim didn't want to answer Meat's emails asking very personal questions. I don't know for sure but Meat probably asked these questions after listening to gossip. > I'm so bored of this Meat bashing. > > Jim knows that Meat is a blabbermouth, so why tell him > something that he so desperately wants to remain private? > Also, if Meat was emailing Jim to see how he was, why did > no-one from "Team Jim" mail him back? > > You & JD tell us that work on the musical is continous and > ongoing, so surely someone would have been checking Jim's > email if he was unable to do it himself? > > > > I wonder if Meat posted the video asking for information > > about Jim's health to create publicity for himself. Every > > time he has a new product coming out, he finds some way to > > connect himself to Jim. As JD said, there are several > > people he could have contacted in private. > > > > I agree with JD saying that Meat Loaf was way out of line > > (although she certainly did not over react as one poster > > said - I think she was actually quite polite when you > > consider how stupid Meat was). > > > > I think it was Bellminer who said that Meat and Jim are > > freinds again because they exchanged emails about Popstar > > To Operastar. But how close can they be if Jim is not > > returning emails now (according to the video) and Meat > > feels that he needs to make a plea for information via the > > Internet? > > > > Surely this video will cause more tension in their on and > > off friendship (although it looks like the relationship is > > more like a sibling one). Maybe not like TMIL caused but > > it will surely cause some friction. Meat has exposed Jim's > > private life (which Jim didn't want people discussing). > > And now Scaramouche tells us that Meat says anyone who > > doesn't like it can "F off". > > > > There has been a lot of talk recently about Jim being in > > Meat's shadow (even though Jim has achieved much more than > > Meat). It is in Meat's book that the shadow has caused a > > lot of friction between the two. But the shadow will > > remain if Meat keeps connecting himself to Jim with cheap > > publicity stunts like the requesting information about > > Jim's health video. > > > > I disagre with the posters like Conas who seem angry that > > JD and the "Jim Camp" did not post anything about > > something Jim wants to remain private. What did these > > negative posters excpect her and the "Jim Camp" to do? | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: No Wonder There Is Tension Between Jim And Meat - With Such A Cheap Publicity Stunt - Rob 12:16 pm UTC 02/14/10 |
| Next: | re: No Wonder There Is Tension Between Jim And Meat - With Such A Cheap Publicity Stunt - Markus 12:51 pm UTC 02/14/10 |
| Thread: | |