| re: Band from 90s | |
|
Posted by: |
RepeatandFade 09:52 pm UTC 02/16/10 |
| In reply to: | re: Band from 90s - John_Galt 09:13 pm UTC 02/16/10 |
| I wonder if it troubles Jim that so many elaborate stories told and dreams dreamt in the last few decades revolve around "new Jim Steinman songs" and there are few new "Jim Steinman songs" to be had. There isn't a week that goes by that someone doesn't observe, in some story or on some blog, that Jim Steinman should be writing for this person or that person. It is all the more mind-blowing to me that we have now gone an entire decade without a single (pardon the pun) new Jim Steinman release in America. I mean, that additional production on "Us" is great and all -- best additional production I have ever heard. I thought for sure we'd get a Jim song called "Cash For Clunkers." MD > That's correct. Supposedly, they were based in Santa > Barbara, California. The legend goes that Jim recorded a > full album with them including new Jim Steinman songs, but > that a divorce that involved a member or the band and/or > another part of the creative/business team prevented > release of the album due to some legal mumbo-jumbo. It's > not clear that the album was finished in any real sense > when the fighting broke out. Supposedly, Jim's connection > to the group was that one of the members was a childhood > friend. There's no telling what motivated Jim's > involvement. > > I think I remember JD officially announcing that the whole > Night Shift thing is officially untrue. It's kind of an > elaborate story for something that is entirely untrue, > though. > > -=John Galt=- > > > What was the name of the band from the 90s that Jim was > > supposedly doing a whole album with? > > > > Nightshift? | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Band from 90s - John_Galt 09:13 pm UTC 02/16/10 |
| Next: | re: Band from 90s - Jsteinfan 02:47 pm UTC 02/17/10 |
| Thread: |
|