HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: steven stuart said...

Posted by:
Infinite_Victims 03:54 pm UTC 02/17/10
In reply to: re: steven stuart said... - steven_stuart 01:10 am UTC 02/16/10



> The Meat bashing is getting boring. I'm sure that many
> posters found my post to be boring. But I had to agree
> with Conas. Jim does not want Meat to record WPOMBHTM and
> I had to give the reasons. It would be great if Jim
> changed his mind and Meat managed to pull off a wonderful
> performance. What a single that would be. Bonnie might be
> the only other person who could interpret those lyrics but
> unfortunately I think Meat has a better chance of getting
> radio airplay.

"Body" may be Jim's last great new song. I find it more suited to a a male vocal the way I get the lyrics - but I felt IACBTMN wasa female song but Meat did it anyway.
The only thing that is going to grab the general public's attention is a Meat Loaf version produced by Jim. I think they pretty much had the song done with Dream Engine to where Meat could do the vocals on existing arrangements. The only other attention getter is to use some young singer & I can not fathom one that could do the job properly and the style of the song is not suited to today's sound (which is crap), Jim's songs are born out of time. I think that limits "Body" to Meat or Bonnie to get a proper version that will resonate with the public.


reply |

Previous: re: steven stuart said... - steven_stuart 01:10 am UTC 02/16/10
Next: re: Should Meat and Jim... - Daniel 08:23 pm UTC 02/14/10

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE