not logged in
| re: Exposing 'Privates' in public !! | |
Posted by:  |
Markus 05:18 pm UTC 03/03/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Exposing 'Privates' in public !! - Smeghead 05:14 pm UTC 03/03/07 |
| Sure - He defintitely will stop sharing stuff Markus. > The point is Ray didn't want it out there. He told Ryan > and me that when he sent it to us. Ryan made a mistake by > sending it to someone who could share it with others. If > something is given to you with the understanding it not > get around then you should keep it to yourself. Will Jim > care. Nope. Will Ray care... probably not... he's got > more important things to worry about. Has Ryan learned a > lesson? I hope so. > > > Hmmm...the posting of 'Private of Privates' online; a good > > thing or a bad thing? > > > > A good thing of course; an unheard Steinman track is > > always a joy to hear, and I quite like this one. > > > > I don't think a song this old needs to be locked away for > > a select few, and now thankfully it has been exposed to a > > few more Steinman fans who will hopefully get some genuine > > pleasure from it. > > > > Is Jim mad? I don't think he gives two shits that it's > > 'out there', judging by more recent mp3's he has provided. > > I'll even suggest he probably forgot it existed. > > > > Is Ray mad? I would guess he 'aint really bothered. > > > > Bear in mind this is a poor recording of a 30 year plus > > piano/vocal demo. If it was gonna be used for anything, I > > think Ray and/or Jim would have done it by now. > > > > Let's be honest, it really is only gonna be heard by a few > > hundred people tops?? > > > > If it was a recording of a current project (ie Bat > > musical), then that is more serious, and I would hope > > someone would check with JD first (ie seeking Jim's > > permission). > > > > I posted a brief review after hearing Privates, and > > expected a few more, instead there was a load of > > bollocks. > > > > If Jim and Ray were reading, I think they would have > > preferred some comments/reviews on the song, rather than > > who should/shouldn't have posted it. > > > > BTW - If I find anything remotely Steinman related, I'll > > always share for free, and don't need any thanks or > > credits (I hate egos), and Puddings Blog seems to be the > > logical place at the moment! > > > > So cheers to Pudding for posting his 'Privates' & running > > the blog, and cheers to Ryan for showing his 'Privates' to > > Pudding & running Bat Out Of Excess - Great Site!! | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Exposing 'Privates' in public !! - Pudding 09:09 pm UTC 03/03/07 |
| Next: | re: Exposing 'Privates' in public !! - Pudding 08:59 pm UTC 03/03/07 |
| Thread: |
|