27 doesn't seem very good to me either, though as Vin says with the minimal (and not very well chosen) promotion it's been given, I guess it's not as bad as might have been expected.
What matters more than its peak chart position is how long it can stay up (ooer, missus). If its performance in the UK and elsewhere is anything to go by, then it can look forward to a lifespan that would cause a Mayfly to hang its head in shame.
Dave
> 27th is hardly good in fairness. He should be at least
> getting into the top 10 given his reputation and
> popularity. It's the only Meat album I don't have, and I
> don't intend on buying it either. The songs just aren't
> good enough to make any impact in the charts.
>
> He should be sticking with piano rock and power ballads
> that's what he sings best, and yet again he gets another
> brutal prouducer to make him an album.
>
>
> > According to Billboard Top 200 albums. Gotta say, I'm
> > pleasantly surprised for Meat. Way better than I
> > expected. Probably sink like a stone from here, but
> > still...
|
