| re: batmusical.com | |
|
Posted by: |
AndrewG 05:37 pm UTC 09/30/10 |
| In reply to: | batmusical.com - daveake 08:48 am UTC 09/29/10 |
| It's a shame as I would have liked to have seen the forum been successful. I've always found Smeg and Pud's posts interesting and amusing and them being banned from here/not posting here (whichever the situation may be now) I used to check in with what they were up to and had to say about Jim's stuff every so often. I do appreciate that there is absolutely NO point in having the forum or site if there is NO musical. There is no hint whatsoever that I have personally heard/read making me think or believe that there is still a musical coming out and I am assuming therefore Steinman has pretty much retired now. So new websites or forums are pretty much a waste of time indeed. The fact that the technology/look of this forum is from the late 90s pretty much shows me time has stood still in the Steinman camp for a LONG time. > As some (but probably not many) of you will have noticed, > I've removed the site and, in particular, the forum. > > What it boiled down to was that I was unwilling to be held > accountable for failing, by choice or by omission, to > remove certain posts. > > I created the forum last year following the Evening > Standard advert. The time seemed right to have a forum to > discuss and support the forthcoming musical, but in > hindsight that was premature miscalculation. > > The result was a forum with little to discuss aside from > the frustration of seeing no apparent progress. > There's little reason to keep the forum going and as > suggested above I have a very strong reason for not doing > so. > > That's probably as much as I'm willing to say in public, > so I probably won't answer any questions here. I do > however have a working email address. > > Dave | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: batmusical.com - daveake 05:41 am UTC 10/02/10 |
| Next: | re: batmusical.com - Conas 08:10 pm UTC 09/29/10 |
| Thread: | |