D'you mean Alex Grey? Yep his work is quite literally something else... 8o
> I'm divided between the first 2. TMIL's can goto some
> place where I don't have a memory. I would rather look at
> the Dark Side Of The Moon cover. Or the Midnight At The
> Lost And Found cover. or the Stranger In Town cover. But
> I'll probably just wind up looking through the artwork by
> Paul Grey who famously collaborated with band 'Tool'
>
> > Call me crazy, but.... I've always assumed the Bat I
> > bat is just a statue in the graveyard, as opposed to an
> > actual, live Bat. But now, for the first-time, I'm
> > looking at it as though its a live, giant Bat sitting on
> > top of a church. Good God. Which is it??? Have I been
> > missing the point all these years?? And Bat I IS my fave
> > Bat cover by far, too!
> >
> > > Vin, you may well have a point when you write: "As for the
> > > monster-bat, that started w/ Bat II, which presumably had
> > > Jim's approval." However, if you look at just the cover
> > > artwork, the Bat 3 bat looks much more fierce than the
> > > first two bats. Which of the three bats do posters prefer?
> > > I personally like the Bat 2 bat because he is sitting on
> > > top of the Chrysler Building and the scene around it looks
> > > like post-apocalyptic New York, which fits in with
> > > Obsidian in the "Neverland" ("BOOH The Musical) story. It
> > > really is a huge bat though. Wow. You could call it a
> > > monster (the King Kong of bats) but the Bat 3 bat is more
> > > ferocious.
> > >
|
