not logged in
| re: JD - Update? | |
Posted by:  |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 10:24 pm UTC 10/22/10 |
| In reply to: | re: JD - Update? - steven_stuart 02:53 am UTC 10/21/10 |
| I hope your not wrong about Jim blogging dude, would really love to hear fomr the great man, and if I'm being honest I'm wandering if he watched No time like the future, vein of me I know but still, man can dream. > > I did see > > the DVD and it was intense - to say the least. > > Especially Andre De Shields as Hook. He is a wonderful > performer and made his lines sound like they were written > by Shakespeare (actually, Jim can be quite Shakesperean, > like in the "God Has Left The Building" speech). > > I don't see why it would hurt the show just to release > parts of Andre's performance. Loads of posters are > familiar with old versions of the script and it hasn't > changed that much. > > I like your choice of word when you say "intense". Very > diplomatic. That word could be used to describe the awful > but interesting Ken Russell music video that accompanied > one of the songs. Was it for "Heaven Can Wait"? I can't > remember. He didn't direct it. It was clips from one of > his films where someone dies and they wake up surrounded > by extremely camp angels. > > > Just remember - Jim is always willing but it's not always > > up to him. > > Jim and Elva and David agree about the gag order. Elva and > David couldn't stop Jim if he really wanted to do > something. > > I love all three of them but I am wondering why they can't > give out just some information or something like the Andre > De Shields clips from the DVD. > > Especially when the current gag order is actually leading > to some misinformation. For example, people searching for > information about the musical will find Jim's throw away > remark about "BOOH" being "like Cirque on acid", which is > not true but one might believe that in the absence of any > other information. > > I hope everyone believes you when you say that "the Bat > musical really is still moving along in a fantastic > fashion" because this is the truth. Those who still doubt > after you have said that will be getting the proof they > need in the very near future. Jim will blog about it all > before Christmas. I can almost guarantee it. > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: JD - Update? - steven_stuart 02:53 am UTC 10/21/10 |
| Next: | re: JD - Update? - steven_stuart 11:22 pm UTC 10/22/10 |
| Thread: |
|