| re: and here it is ... |
|
Posted by:
 |
WarioLoaf 05:34 pm UTC 11/02/10 |
| In reply to: |
re: and here it is ... - Infinite_Victims 05:31 pm UTC 11/02/10 |
|
even at Meat's WORST hes better then anyone else's attempts.
I tell ya even the 204 gig mentioned where he was outta tune I bet is still better then any bat by anyone else.
> I have never once since 1978 (sue me, I'm old) heard
> anyone - imitators excuse me - "tributes" included, do the
> song justice. I almost view it as sacrilege anytime anyone
> else tries. I will take one of Meat's worst attempts and
> put it up against this Wagner dude. He should be shot for
> even attempting a Steinman song, I wish Jim could sue him
> for butchering it.
>
> > Evil One has proved me wrong.
> >
> > and well of course the song has had some clunker
> > performances, but even then in 2004 when you wnet it was
> > better then anyone else singing it...
> >
>
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: and here it is ... - steven_stuart 02:43 am UTC 11/07/10 |
| Next: |
re: and here it is ... - Infinite_Victims 05:40 pm UTC 11/02/10 |
|
| Thread: |
|