Really? Well its you against the world.
yes Jim's LITD blows Meats outta the water but if Meat did it in 1981 then it'd be different.
Whatever you think about Meat is fine but IMHO Meat is the only person who should sing Jim songs. Meat should've done everything Jim has written. But drama is drama.
and BTW: youre Torchwood arent you? :)
>
> At the end of the day, its all personal opinion, and
> whilst technically Meat may well be stronger as a vocalist
> then Jim, Jim embodies his lyrics alot better then Meat
> does, his version of More then you deserve blows both of
> Meat's version out of the water, and Jim nailed LITD in a
> way Meat never could have dreamed. Jim has an frantic
> intensity that Meat just lacks, out of all the things that
> never came to be, its a shame (IMHO anyway) that Jim
> never sang more. I mean, have you heard Jim vocal on
> Graveyard shift. So haunting and emotional, and Meat just
> cant do things like that so yes, I do think Jim could have
> done a better job than Meat.
>
> > Uh, gotta disagree there. Jim had to have help on his
> > own album, he was good but in Meat's class vocally?
> > Obviously Jim did not think so. Can't imagine Jim
> > surpassing Meat on say "FCOL" or "Bat".
> >
> > > Meat is talented sure, but Jim is another league to Meat
> > > and surpassed him in almost every aspect, even in singing.
> >
> >
> >
|
