| re: Left in the Dark, how it is suppossed to be |
|
Posted by:
 |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 04:32 am UTC 11/21/10 |
| In reply to: |
Left in the Dark, how it is suppossed to be - WarioLoaf 02:27 am UTC 11/21/10 |
|
Love what you did with intro, would never have guessed it was added in, but I got disagree with you here man. Jim's version is till (by far)the best, until the end course, Meat's performance is dull and kinda strained (As I understand, this is when his voice really began to change drastically, and it sounds like its sort of in a transitional phase)
> Say if you like Meat or Jims version better (most will say
> Jim as I will)
>
> BUT what surpasses Jim's version is meat's live take on it
> which has never been released with soundboard quality.
>
> But here is as close as well get:
>
>
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Left in the Dark, how it is suppossed to be - Marklbetya 09:01 pm UTC 11/21/10 |
| Next: |
Hairy Bikers - daveake 09:31 am UTC 11/20/10 |
|
| Thread: |
|