| re: The Definitive 200 | |
|
Posted by: |
Vin 04:35 pm UTC 03/09/07 |
| In reply to: | re: The Definitive 200 - tragichippy 11:41 pm UTC 03/08/07 |
| I suppose if one views "classic rock" as being a tag applied to rock of a certain time period, as opposed to a genre, then it is applicable to all styles and would include Bat. But I tend to think of "classic rock" as a genre of guitar driven late '60s - 1970's rock n roll, compared to which Bat is very different. > i see what you mean - and kinda agree - but the classic > rock umbrella is so vast nowadays it includes so many > different genres... > > > I hate when Bat is called "classic rock." It may be > > classic in its own right, but how can it belong to that > > genre when it sounds nothing like the vast majority of its > > peers? > > > > > > > > > > > http://definitive200.com/200_list.php > > > > > > > > > kitsch, do it big. And what could be more kitschy and > > > emblematic of the '70s than the ubiquitous "classic rock" > > > (an overused adjective that applies all too well here) of > > > "Two out of Three Ain't Bad" or the breathless > > > nookie-quest, "Paradise by the Dashboard Light," replete > > > with Phil Rizzuto calling the play-by-play? This digitally > > > remastered edition also includes '78-vintage > > > > Celine's Falling Into You (# 91) and the Footloose > > > soundtrack (# 134) also made the cut. > > > > > > sb | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: The Definitive 200 - tragichippy 11:41 pm UTC 03/08/07 |
| Next: | re: The Definitive 200 - Scarecrow's_Brain 09:42 pm UTC 03/08/07 |
| Thread: | |