| re: Meat or Jim | |
|
Posted by: |
Conas 10:49 pm UTC 03/11/07 |
| In reply to: | Meat or Jim - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 09:57 pm UTC 03/11/07 |
| Well Meat did have a more powerful voice than Jim, and he could sing live. Jim does have a good voice but he suffered from stage fright and seem scared at the prospect of singing live by himself, and that's why Bad for Good didn't do as well as it should have, and that's the reason why Jim didn't succeed in a solo career. > OK sorry if this has been o her before. But from the songs > MEat And Jim have sang. Who do you think is better. For em > its Jim. He seems to eman what he sings about. When > Meatloaf sings them there a little less convincing | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Meat or Jim - Venom 05:58 am UTC 03/12/07 |
| Next: | re: Meat or Jim - rockfenris2005 06:43 am UTC 03/12/07 |
| Thread: |
|