| re: Jim Steinman Vs Diane Warren | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 01:12 pm UTC 03/25/11 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim Steinman Vs Diane Warren - rockfenris2005 01:08 pm UTC 03/25/11 |
> > > > > ILFY works for me musically, but the lyrics are pretty > > > bad. And I'll never know why she wrote, "I'd walk across > > > the fire for you, I'd walk on the WILD for you." Come > > > on, Diane, you've already jampacked the song with a trove > > > of trite, rote cliches. No point feigning artistic > > > ingenuity now. Why not just go for the obvious, natural, > > > easy, SENSICAL rhyme here: "I'd walk on the WIRE for you." > > > What you've written doesn't really even make sense. Is > > > that short-hand for "walk on the wild SIDE for you?" > > > > > > This has always bugged me. > > > > Ha ha. Well said. > > Well, there's a lyric in "Everything I do I do it for > you": > > You can't tell me it's not worth trying for > I can't help it, there's nothing I want more > I would fight for you > I'd lie for you > Walk the wire for you > I'd die for you... > > I could be really pedantic here and say that she not only > wrote a song like "Anything for Love" but this song as > well... > > Except she says "wild" instead of "wire". I agree with Vin. I don't know why she wrote "wild" instead of "wire". The line doesn't really make sense to me. How do you walk ON the wild? You can walk IN the wild or THROUGH the wild. If you're writing a fantasy, you can walk OVER the wild if you're a witch that's levitating, or you can walk UNDER the wild and it's like something out of a Jules Verne novel... | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim Steinman Vs Diane Warren - rockfenris2005 01:08 pm UTC 03/25/11 |
| Next: | re: Jim Steinman Vs Diane Warren - samurai7 02:06 pm UTC 03/26/11 |
| Thread: |
|