not logged in
| re: Article from late last year about Hell in a Handbasket | |
Posted by:  |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 12:46 am UTC 04/29/11 |
| In reply to: | re: Article from late last year about Hell in a Handbasket - Wilbury 12:11 am UTC 04/29/11 |
| Hmm, Jim's blog entries about Bat 3 (and his brief stint posting on the board) seemed to suggest that he was okay with Meat (I think he even suggested that Meat could sing some songs for something related to the Bat musical, though I could be misremembering) I dont think Jim or Meat hate each other at all, I think they've simply had their fill of working together. They've made some great work together, probably could do again. But there is such a thing as too much water under the bridge, and when applied that to Meat and Jim, the continent that bridge is on has been completely submerged. Alot of that was likely out off their hands but still, sometimes is better to count your losses and move on, hopefully to success for both of them > For all we know Jim could ACTUALLY be too busy hating > Meat's guts for suing him and using his IP and forcing his > hand in to a settlement he would rather have avoided. So > once again, the convenient angle Meat is putting on it ma > not be all there is to it. > > > > > No need to worry. No reall "leftovers". > > > > Meat had lots of songs at the start of the HCTB sessions, > > but Rob Cavallo just picked "Like A Rose" and "Lets Be In > > Love" (and maybe "Los Angeloser")as fitting with the kind > > of album he envisioned. So they flew in outside writers > > like Justin Hawkins and did not record/produce those > > "leftovers" at all. Bottom line: not songs that did not > > make the final cut (like "Prize Fight Lover") but songs > > that Rob Cavallo considered inappropiate for HCTB, > > although Meat had handpicked them. > > > > To me this does not justify any judgement about these > > songs. Maybe besides the fact that they might be more > > classic Meat style than some HCTB. > > > > Nevertheless Meat has been fair enough to state on mlukfc > > that he would love to do new Steinmusic, but the Steincamp > > saying he is too busy with the Bat-musical... > > I´m sure another collaboration would be for the benefit of > > both of them, no matter wether for "Hell In A Handbasket" > > or Jims musical. And for the benefit of us in need of a > > new drug of course. > > > > MMP > > > > > Left over songs from Teddy Bear forming the track list for > > > his new album. Can't say I'm best pleased to be honest. > > > Hang Cool Teddy Bear was as good as it was ever gonna be > > > (Which isnt bad by any means, twas a fun album) songs that > > > didn't make the cut didnt make the cut for a reason. Hope > > > this gets dis proven > > > > > > > Here's an article from Aug last year that mentions Hell in > > > > a Handbasket. A few people here have said they suspected > > > > it might be the bits that didn't fit on Teddy Bear. > > > > > > > > I'd hoped that wasn't the case, but this article > > > > explicitly says that it is. It was the intention, anyway. > > > > I mean, it was always on the cards but I hadn't actually > > > > read it anywhere before. > > > > > > > > Frankly... I'm devo. Completely devo. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Article from late last year about Hell in a Handbasket - Wilbury 12:11 am UTC 04/29/11 |
| Next: | re: Article from late last year about Hell in a Handbasket - Wilbury 01:15 am UTC 04/29/11 |
| Thread: |
|