> >
> > Personally, I think he should have just cancelled. It
> > would have been much better if the album didn't exist at
> > all, and, you know, "Two out of three ain't bad..." ;-)
> >
>
> I assume that by the time it got to this point, Meat had
> signed the dotted line saying that it would be done, and
> it would cost X million in lost revenue for the label if
> Meat no longer wants to do it.
What would have happened if he had changed his mind at that point? They would have sued him? Tore up his record contract? Given him a bad name? No label would ever release his albums again?
|
