HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Breaking The Solemn Pact

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 06:20 am UTC 05/16/11
In reply to: Breaking The Solemn Pact - steven_stuart 01:58 am UTC 05/16/11



> > Having Desmond and John 5 come along and do Monster is
> > Loose must really have been salt in the wound for Jim.
> >
> > If Meat ever wants to talk to Jim again, he really went
> > the wrong way about it.
>
> He really did. If only they hadn't used the Bat Out Of
> Hell title.

I know. It would have been so much easier not to have to live up to the Bat name, when Jim wasn't involved. But I suppose they couldn't change it. It was too far gone at that stage.

Jim said that they made a solemn pact not to
> do anything Bat without each other. At least Jim is now
> free to do "BOOH: The Musical" without including Meat
> Loaf.
>
> Although, I agree with the point Croftie made way down
> this page.
>
> Someone had said: 'songs like Body and Children need a
> young, youthful unique and consistent voice'
>
> Croftie replied: "No they don't. They need the opposite.
> They need a fragile, weather-beaten, defeated voice. Meat
> would be perfect IMO."

I think all those songs would have been perfect for Meat and Bat 3. These songs matched his age. There was a vulnerability in these songs that was very moving for me. "Still the children" and "Who needs the young?" belong in the Bat universe as far as I am concerned.



reply |

Previous: Breaking The Solemn Pact - steven_stuart 01:58 am UTC 05/16/11
Next: re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - Evil_One 07:25 pm UTC 05/15/11

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE