| re: So actually, to sum it up more succinctly… |
|
Posted by:
 |
rockfenris2005 04:13 pm UTC 05/29/11 |
| In reply to: |
re: So actually, to sum it up more succinctly… - Wilbury 03:49 pm UTC 05/29/11 |
|
> Doesn't sound very likely tho, does it. Remembering that
> Steinman has said that "if pandora's box had been a
> success then there wouldn't have been a Bat 2". I doubt
> they were in solid contact thru this time.
>
> And it's not like Meat doesn't have the vocal chops all on
> his own.I guess it would just be the subtle nuances that
> Jim would have coaxed out of him. Maybe that last 10% that
> turns a natural talent into a Grammy award winner.
>
> I definitely hear a difference on bat2, sounds
> significantly better than anything he did either side.
>
> Bat2 is pitch perfect, instead of meat ending every line a
> semi tone flat. With the exception of the second last line
> of It Just Won't Quit. "So long aGO". A *wee* bit flat. A
> lot annoying. Not sure why Jim wouldn't have kept going
> til this one was perfect.
>
> I still think good girls is meats best performance.
You've said that before. I've never really paid attention to his performance, just the song itself. But I definitely think he's brilliant on "Objects".
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: So actually, to sum it up more succinctly… - Wilbury 03:49 pm UTC 05/29/11 |
| Next: |
Good Girls (Live) - rockfenris2005 04:14 pm UTC 05/29/11 |
|
| Thread: |
|