| re: Q re: Nowhere Fast | |
|
Posted by: |
samurai7 03:00 pm UTC 05/31/11 |
| In reply to: | re: Q re: Nowhere Fast - Wilbury 12:11 pm UTC 05/31/11 |
| I know what you mean. To me it's like two different songs that share a chorus. > Frankly, I find them so different that they're almost like > the two different conceptions of A Kiss Is A Terrible > Thing To Waste. > > Almost. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anybody know whether Meat's version of nowhere Fast > > > > > is a variation by Jim or rather the result of meat and > > > > > team taking it upon themselves to rearrange a Jim > > > > > composition beyond recognition, ala Pig? > > > > > > > > I heard the Meat Loaf version was the first draft for > > > > "Streets of Fire"? > > > > > > > > > > Oh OK. That's interesting, I had assumed that it started > > > with recycled bits and meat removed them. Rather than it > > > starting more sparse and the recycled bits added later. > > > > > > > > > > It's too much like a Jim song, if you know what I mean. I > > can't imagine the other writers stepping in and coming up > > with the new verses. I actually prefer the lyric from the > > Meat Loaf version, whereas I prefer the production from > > the other version. And because of that, I like both > > versions and cannot choose. > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Q re: Nowhere Fast - Wilbury 12:11 pm UTC 05/31/11 |
| Next: | re: Q re: Nowhere Fast - Evil_One 08:16 pm UTC 05/31/11 |
| Thread: |
|