| re: Still NJC ;) |
|
Posted by:
 |
Chika 03:28 am UTC 06/23/11 |
| In reply to: |
re: Still NJC ;) - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 11:20 pm UTC 06/22/11 |
|
No you are so wrong. Iīm not jealous. Just write NJC in the "title" of the message if it does not include something to do with Jim. Thatīs why I am here and the rest of the world. To read/discuss something about JIM STEINMAN.
>
> Whatever your problem is, why dont you take it elsewhere,
> preffarably privately. You read JD's message from Jim, he
> thinks of us as his extended family, so why should Ryan
> not share his work with all of us here. Perhaps it's
> jealousy, jealousy of not making anything worthwhile like
> he's doing. Perhaps all the time hounding him could be
> spent changing that
> >
> >
> > > I have to disagree with you Chika. You have been visiting
> > > the board for several years and you should know by now
> > > that Ryan is influenced by Jim. He does not imitate Jim in
> > > the way that Lady Gaga and Diane Warren sometimes do but
> > > he is influenced by the spririt of Jim. His love for Jim
> > > has encouraged him to get in touch with his creative side
> > > and it has made him a better songwriter. There are several
> > > others on the board who are influenced by Jim's spirit.
> > > Not all of them are songwriters but Jim has helped to
> > > inspire their creativity. Any talk about artists who are
> > > inspired by Jim is relevant and does not require the "NJC"
> > > label. In my opinion.
> > >
> > >
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
Why Use Ryan's Artwork As An Avatar???????? - steven_stuart 01:19 am UTC 06/26/11 |
| Next: |
No Jesus Content - steven_stuart 01:11 am UTC 06/26/11 |
|
| Thread: |
|