| re: Not Allowed To Love/ Jim Needs Better Publicity |
|
Posted by:
 |
Tremorlor 05:40 am UTC 07/06/11 |
| In reply to: |
re: Not Allowed To Love/ Jim Needs Better Publicity - steven_stuart 02:18 am UTC 07/06/11 |
|
> > Either you have a short memory span or incapable of
> > reading responses.
>
> Hee hee. When was it pointed out to me? I can't remember.
http://jimsteinman.com/messageboard/d.php?id=40863
http://jimsteinman.com/messageboard/d.php?id=36899
http://jimsteinman.com/messageboard/d.php?id=32646
There's a search feature on this board. Plus there's google.
> > An ad without a follow-up, woot. Talk about money wasted.
>
> Oh my goodness. You are correct. I could have lived in the
> best suite on the Queen Mary 2 for an entire year for the
> money that the ad cost.
So the ad served a purpose in your opinion? Which would that be exactly?
By now people will have forgotten the ad or that there's a show somewhere in the planning stages. You could just as well have thrown the money into the Thames.
> I can't remember the exact cost. As you say, I have a
> short memory span. But I think it was well over 50,000
> pounds.
Pocket money then, nothing worth mentioning.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Not Allowed To Love/ Jim Needs Better Publicity - steven_stuart 02:18 am UTC 07/06/11 |
| Next: |
re: Not Allowed To Love/ Jim Needs Better Publicity - steven_stuart 09:37 pm UTC 07/07/11 |
|
| Thread: |
|