HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Why does Jim not think bigger?

Posted by:
mickp 08:45 pm UTC 04/28/13
In reply to: Why does Jim not think bigger? - Scaramouche 09:15 am UTC 04/28/13

I'm not sure about the songs you mentioned but when I heard it the first thing a thought of was an old style double album - one of Jim stuff and one of other stuff. You only need 6 or seven songs from Jim

> > The thing I don't understand is why does Jim not think bigger?
>
> Exactly. I can only hope/think that Jim is planning one
> more album project AFTER this Meat album, and is saving a
> lot of good stuff for that?
>
> Maybe Jim is asking too much money (for individual songs)
> and the budget cannot cover more than 2-3?
>
> I mentioned a few weeks ago that if this Meat album is
> still gonna be called 'Brave & Crazy', they could split
> the project into two 'sides'. Jim & Rinkoff work on 4-6
> (Steinman) songs for 'Brave' and Paul Crook produces 5-6
> songs (from other writers) for 'Crazy'.
>
> I really don't think a lack of (Steinman) material would
> be a problem:
>
> What Part of My Body Hurts The Most?
> More
> Braver Than We Are
> Something from 'Garbo'
> Vaults of Heaven (Rory Dodd version)
> Loving You's a Dirty Job (Patti Russo)
> Yogi (substitute Kansas for Texas)
> Paradise Lost
>
>
>
>
>
>


reply |

Previous: Why does Jim not think bigger? - Scaramouche 09:15 am UTC 04/28/13
Next: re: YouTube of Meat on Jonathan Ross - Markus 08:36 am UTC 04/28/13

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE