Honestly... when has anything that has ever happened to Meat been part of something he did??
Every time he releases anything... it's always someone else's fault that things didn't work out as well as they could have...
The pressure from the company, the fact that Jim is too slow, writers who didn't do as they promised, songs that were not available at the time, singers/musicians that weren't available at the time, technical difficulties at live shows, whatever...
And while all of this may be true... while all of this may be part of the reasons why... it's his name on the cover... so why the hell release something you can't support for at least 99%??
Is the bloke still so strapped for cash???
Does he still not have the confidence to say Fuck That I Ain't Going There! ???
Oh scratch that last one... we all know the man has no balls...
-K-
>
>
> > > > I was surprised that Meat Loaf's version of IACBTMN went
> > > > to number six in the UK charts and to number one in
> > > > Norway. Maybe because by that time it was an official
> > > > Celine song. Although, he did do it as a duet. I guess
> > > > that was putting another spin on it.
> > >
> > > Whereas over here I don't think we even got an actual
> > > release of the single. Sigh... In addition to everything
> > > else, I think the record company let him down on that
> > > album, because they could have released more singles, like
> > > "The future ain't what it used to be" with Jennifer Hudson
> > > when she'd just won an Oscar for "Dreamgirls".
> >
> > That's an excellent point. I wonder why the record company
> > let him down. Was it because Jim was not directly
> > involved? Although, I seem to remember someone saying that
> > the record company was at first putting pressure on Meat
> > to make Bat 3 with or without Jim.
>
> They put all that pressure on Meat, right, and then they
> don't even do a good enough job promoting it?
>
|
