HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Bat III

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 09:12 pm UTC 05/11/21
In reply to: re: Bat III - steven_stuart 08:42 pm UTC 05/11/21


That's the million dollar question, isn't it? If Meat and Jim had actually done BOOH 3 together, how would it have fared in the 2000s? Would Meat have had another comeback? I like to think so, yes, with "Body" as the BOOH 3 version of "Anything for Love".

> Legally it counts as BOOH 3. The producers of the stage
> version were allowed to use any song from the three BOOH
> albums plus any new songs that Jim chose to give the show.
> Like Body. Because Meat recorded a version of IACBTMN, the
> song could be used in the show. It would have been cool if
> Meat had recorded Body. But could it be a hit single like
> AFL?
>
>
> > I believe he was referring to the album (Bat III) as that
> > damnable shit fest, only he referred to it as "Monster is
> > Loose" which speaks volumes. Meat has also said "There is
> > no Bat III". It leaves us with an interesting debate.
> > There is technically a "Bat III" that you can still buy,
> > but spiritually does it count as "Bat III"?
> >
> > I like the album. How I judge it, ultimately in the end,
> > is you can listen to it in the car. I obviously don't like
> > it as much as the other two and was profoundly
> > disappointed over what happened. Fifteen years later I
> > still think the whole situation was BS and they should
> > have done it together at some point. If they'd been
> > allowed to wait till Braver, they could have done a Bat
> > III together then.
> >
> > > Ryan, what exactly did Jim mean by that?
> > >
> > > > He had made this comment while talking about "Only When I
> > > > Feel" from Braver on social media in 2016:
> > > >
> > > > Quote:
> > > >
> > > > I LOVE "Only When I Feel" -- but Meat cut the fast heavy
> > > > bridge on that damnable shit fest THE MONSTER IS LOOSE,
> > > > and now heís JUST cut the slow yearning part. Itís like
> > > > splitting Siamese twins apart with a chainsaw!! But I love
> > > > hearing the heartbreaking part. JS
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I remember based on the blog and messages here that
> > > > > Steinman had an order not to comment negatively on Bat 3
> > > > > (in public)
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone have his true (candid) opinions on the album?
> > > > >
> > > > > Not meaning to be insensitive. But the gossip in me has
> > > > > always felt that Jim did not do well being gagged.


reply |

Previous: re: Bat III - steven_stuart 08:42 pm UTC 05/11/21
Next: re: Bat III - neverlandfan 12:33 pm UTC 05/10/21

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE