not logged in
| re: Bat III | |
Posted by:  |
rockfenris2005 09:12 pm UTC 05/11/21 |
| In reply to: | re: Bat III - steven_stuart 08:42 pm UTC 05/11/21 |
That's the million dollar question, isn't it? If Meat and Jim had actually done BOOH 3 together, how would it have fared in the 2000s? Would Meat have had another comeback? I like to think so, yes, with "Body" as the BOOH 3 version of "Anything for Love". > Legally it counts as BOOH 3. The producers of the stage > version were allowed to use any song from the three BOOH > albums plus any new songs that Jim chose to give the show. > Like Body. Because Meat recorded a version of IACBTMN, the > song could be used in the show. It would have been cool if > Meat had recorded Body. But could it be a hit single like > AFL? > > > > I believe he was referring to the album (Bat III) as that > > damnable shit fest, only he referred to it as "Monster is > > Loose" which speaks volumes. Meat has also said "There is > > no Bat III". It leaves us with an interesting debate. > > There is technically a "Bat III" that you can still buy, > > but spiritually does it count as "Bat III"? > > > > I like the album. How I judge it, ultimately in the end, > > is you can listen to it in the car. I obviously don't like > > it as much as the other two and was profoundly > > disappointed over what happened. Fifteen years later I > > still think the whole situation was BS and they should > > have done it together at some point. If they'd been > > allowed to wait till Braver, they could have done a Bat > > III together then. > > > > > Ryan, what exactly did Jim mean by that? > > > > > > > He had made this comment while talking about "Only When I > > > > Feel" from Braver on social media in 2016: > > > > > > > > Quote: > > > > > > > > I LOVE "Only When I Feel" -- but Meat cut the fast heavy > > > > bridge on that damnable shit fest THE MONSTER IS LOOSE, > > > > and now he’s JUST cut the slow yearning part. It’s like > > > > splitting Siamese twins apart with a chainsaw!! But I love > > > > hearing the heartbreaking part. JS > > > > > > > > > > > > > I remember based on the blog and messages here that > > > > > Steinman had an order not to comment negatively on Bat 3 > > > > > (in public) > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone have his true (candid) opinions on the album? > > > > > > > > > > Not meaning to be insensitive. But the gossip in me has > > > > > always felt that Jim did not do well being gagged. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Bat III - steven_stuart 08:42 pm UTC 05/11/21 |
| Next: | re: Bat III - neverlandfan 12:33 pm UTC 05/10/21 |
| Thread: | |