| re: Bat III |
|
Posted by:
 |
rockfenris2005 09:15 pm UTC 05/11/21 |
| In reply to: |
re: Bat III - steven_stuart 08:26 pm UTC 05/11/21 |
|
It certainly has managed to find an audience of its own, among more recent fans too from the last 15 years, and in that sense it introduced them to the music, which is great. The sad thing for them is that apparently at least at one point it was not an easy album to find online for some reason.
> Do you think BOOH 3 has found or will find an audience
> with people who like a certain kind of rock that is quite
> different from Jim/Meat style rock?
>
>
> > Yes, by itself, it certainly doesn't struggle as much as a
> > Bat 3 album.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ty Ryan! I did often wonder what Jim thought of bat three
> > > :)
> > > I don't really wanna talk about bat 3 myself lol
> > > as a none bat album fine but not what I would call a bat 1
> > > or a bat 2 which were incredible albums but Meat did his
> > > best.
> > > BTWA Is amazing album Love BTWA
> > >
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Bat III - steven_stuart 08:26 pm UTC 05/11/21 |
| Next: |
re: Bat III - steven_stuart 04:55 pm UTC 05/12/21 |
|
| Thread: |
|