| re: Thanks but | |
|
Posted by: |
Vin 11:44 am UTC 04/06/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Thanks but - rockfenris2005 07:26 am UTC 04/06/07 |
| I think its fair to say that Meat touring and singing helped put a large amount of money in Jim's pockets, as well as generating the recognition within the industry that gave Jim the OPPORTUNITY to pursue his "true ambitions," as you put it. If, over the course of 30 years, so many of those opportunities came to piss, I also think its fair to say, though it may seem harsh, that Jim largely has himself to blame. There's no good reason why someone with Jim's talents hasn't been able to bring more of his projects to fruition, not after the initial success he had, except his own quirks and foibles. > > > >> > I agree with Jim, it would have been so much better if > they just credited it as MEAT LOAF & JIM STEINMAN. > Hopefully the musical will be a big awakening. Meat Loaf > doesn't deserve any credit except for singing it and > touring it. And what exactly did that do for Jim's true > ambitions, stage and screen? ZILCH. > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Thanks but - rockfenris2005 07:26 am UTC 04/06/07 |
| Next: | Furthermore - rockfenris2005 06:07 am UTC 04/06/07 |
| Thread: | |