HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Aerosmith 'story'

Posted by:
Wilbury 11:46 am UTC 04/13/07
In reply to: re: Aerosmith 'story' - RadioMaster 09:15 am UTC 04/13/07

I agree. They ooze the kind of Bon Jovie, Desmond Child thing instead. It's all so lazy and consumable, nothing monumental to speak of. Ingest it and move on, and hope it didn't taste too bad on the way down.

LLike TRASH by Alice Cooper. I frigging love Alice, I think he's a genius, but TRASH is such an all time low. I mean this guy made masterpieces with Bob Ezrin and the whbo's frigging who, to say nothing of the Alice Cooper Band before that. And then had to make that piece of shit, self-concious, plastic-y piece of crap.

... Which brings us upto the present day in the chain of offending Desmond Child crap -- TMiL!


>
>
> > If it were a month ago, I'd send you the Google Books
> > link, but now I can't find it for the life of me, which
> > sucks because I know I saw it somewhere. Steven Tyler used
> > several expletives, and also apparently said he didn't
> > think Jim's style suited the band anyway.
>
> And that's kinda true!
> Imagine: Aerosmith performing songs like Original Sin,
> BOOH, Nowhere fast.....
> C'mon, am I the only one who thinks that wouldnt work at
> all?
> I like Aerosmith, but they're just not the kind of band to
> perform Steinman songs.


reply |

Previous: re: Aerosmith 'story' - RadioMaster 09:15 am UTC 04/13/07
Next: re: Aerosmith 'story' - rockfenris2005 11:54 am UTC 04/13/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE