| re: Burma Shave | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 07:01 am UTC 04/16/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Burma Shave - pidunk 06:47 am UTC 04/16/07 |
> What do you mean? > Look, I don't have a problem with you personally because I don't even know you. The only problem I have is your website and the absurd statements you make that Jim is Richard O'Brien and all those other people. Clearly he isn't. If you think that, there's nothing I can do about it, but when you foister it on other people through websites and public channels you can only expect them to react. I reacted. If you want to have a website, go ahead, there's nothing I can do about that, but don't expect people to respect you when you spread massive amounts of lies and insane ridiculous theories when they're clearly not true. And I have the official word on that. That's all there is to it. I wouldn't have said anything to you if you hadn't insulted me about MY site, it's just that you had the gall to do so when YOUR site is full of lies etc. Like I said, I have no problem with you personally, I don't even know you, I just don't like your site and don't agree with any of those insane theories | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Burma Shave - pidunk 06:47 am UTC 04/16/07 |
| Next: | re: Burma Shave - pidunk 09:05 pm UTC 04/15/07 |
| Thread: | |