not logged in
| re: I'm in a "reviewy" mood. | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 12:29 am UTC 04/23/07 |
| In reply to: | re: I'm in a "reviewy" mood. - Smeghead 11:43 pm UTC 04/22/07 |
> > Yes, I'm odd. > > No you are deranged Smeg, I'm sorry you don't like me. Maybe in time your opinion may change. In the meantime, I'll just take your snippets with a grain of salt. > > No, > > Jim is not a cat. > > That Damn grammar error... you posted a picture of two old > people with a cat and said "Here is a picture of Jim and > his parents." What Grammar error is that? A Split > Insanity? Do you really want to see that silly thing again? That was not the caption. The caption was referring to a man, woman and a kitten, true. But I didn't intend to indicate that Jim was in the photo because he was not. Thus, it was an error that the grammar was twistable for someone to pick out an interpretation that I was saying that Jim was the kitten. Ha ha ha and all that. The joke is old. How about just letting it go? > > Neutral, the O'Brien thing is something > > I won't fight about verbally......but I see it the way > > that I see it and show it the way I show it. > > You aren't being neutral if you believe it... And that is > simple insanity. Smeg, you have an anger that is out of proportion from this context. I call that unreasonable. And the grain of salt is well in place. > > > And what about the fact you claim to be married to Jim > and that Jim is a famous Actor in Holywood on the weekends > and that Jim plays Drums on everyones albums including his > own but gives credit to others... I explain all the statements I make in the context of their making, which means that you have taken something out of the context of their explanations. If you got to the point where you got the idea I was claiming a fact, you also went through the process of seeing how that was derived and in such context suggested in the manner it was suggested being as, (as for a marriage, there is no legal context in which I have a claim for being married to anyone, although it is something that has been a topic of persistence in a spiritual and quasi-legal vein, and under such, it is probably the closest thing to theory that I could contemplate...as theory....but I know that if I died today, there would be no particular person clamoring for my remains.) That being the logical progression, it seems apparent you are selectively remembering what you have read. At your option you can, when you mellow out just a little bit, re-read it, slowly, and soak it in. Why don't you go after all the major media news story lies that are accepted as fact in this country? I'm a little bitty kid by comparison. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: I'm in a "reviewy" mood. - pidunk 11:11 am UTC 04/23/07 |
| Next: | re: I'm in a "reviewy" mood. - daveake 01:24 am UTC 04/23/07 |
| Thread: |
|