HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: I'm in a "reviewy" mood.

Posted by:
pidunk 09:10 pm UTC 04/23/07
In reply to: re: I'm in a "reviewy" mood. - daveake 06:48 pm UTC 04/23/07



> > If you want to criticize me why can't you actually pick
> > out something real to use? He is already a famous
> > composer, and he has to be someplace on the
> > weekends.....he does not have to really stretch too hard
> > to be a rock disc jockey on the weekends, so that is not
> > so outrageous even if he does use a different name for it.
> > As part-time jobs go, that's about as part time a job as
> > one could get. Sure it means he is not in Connecticut on
> > the weekends. Scandal!
>
> Having a part-time job isn't outrageous. Suggesting that
> Jim could actually manage to keep a job that involved
> regular hours is stretching things just a tad. However
> the real killer is that you have the nerve to suggest that
> this is Jim Steinman the DJ:
>
> > border="0" alt="Wouldn't we all want to know for sure?
> ">
>


I seem to have many layers of answers today for you Dave. I have two posts following this one which is the first fluster, and now I am setting back a bit, for some relaxed thought. Of course, I should say also that a few tears in between have helped clear the carbunkles. I know you would not want to be in my shoes, for sure you would not. You don't even have to imagine what they may feel like. But, I try to see your point of view. First of all, does your avatar really represent your personality? Do you look like a skull and walk around with a priest's headdress? What this photo of "Dion" is, is an avatar.

I could have been coy and stretched this out by asking you questions about why does it matter, what do you mean, if I felt that such might place your answers into a position where I would have my strongest address of them, but I did not go through those steps, because it does not take much intelligence to wonder about it. What does fit poorly is the manner in which you take all the other logic and ignore it because a photo doesn't meet with your expectations.

We are dealing with the difference between expectations and appearances. The history I have with Jim Cypherd goes back to the point when I was an infant, and a baby, and a young girl, and a young college student, and a young socializer, and a middle aged woman. There are numerous experiences and none of them gave me the idea that I would one day be writing such things as this on this board or any other. I avoided with the happiest of denials from 1987 to 2004 the possibility that he could be the same as this composer. But came time for me to put up the sights and drop the blinders. Now, we have a similar process in a sort of reverse. Now it is not me having the expectations, but it is you.

I've lived in a mindset of academia and investigative thinking my whole life. Others do not have such orientations. I don't want to make others angry because they can't see something they want to see. Or, anger those who fully expect that they can't see what I am saying.

So, there are many layers in my thoughts right now. Just let me state that I hope you might turn your inquiries to a more good faith realm, and trust if you would that I would likewise do that for you as well to your inquiries. I'm not deserving of anger, I really am not.




reply |

Previous: re: I'm in a "reviewy" mood. - daveake 06:48 pm UTC 04/23/07
Next: re: I'm in a "reviewy" mood. - Markus 09:13 pm UTC 04/23/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE