| re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 10:53 am UTC 04/29/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags - rockfenris2005 09:47 am UTC 04/29/07 |
> > He hasn't had a good track-record lately. There are enumerable challenges to having successes on Broadway, but I think the larger point is that ALW does not need to add feathers to his cap, and "track record" applies mostly to those establishing themselves, rather than those who are highly accomplished. Nobody could dispute the successes, and many could explain the failures. It's an irrelevant scale if the shows themselves are good. The difference > is, if "Phantom 2" fails, everyone's going to know about > it. What it matters who or how many know about it, is something that I don't think applies. Of course, everyone will know what happens to the production; so what? Who everyone, actually, anyway? The only major show out of his post-"Phantom" work is, > probably, "Sunset Boulevard". From my view anyway. > > > POTO2 win or lose ALW is still a very very rich man. > > > > Pud > > He'll be fine. It won't be like Steinman and "Dance Of The > Vampires" or the authors of "Carrie". But it will knock > the sails out of him that's for sure There is something inherently objectionable in my opinion to counting another person's money. > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags - rockfenris2005 09:47 am UTC 04/29/07 |
| Next: | re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags - Pudding 10:50 am UTC 04/29/07 |
| Thread: | |