>
>
> >
> > > You can tell me, because you think it is bullshit, that
> > > Jim is not who Jim really is, and you can tell me that
> > > things you want to be true are true, and things you don't
> > > want to be true aren't true, and your statements are, as
> > > you say, bollocks. I am not going to go without my comment
> > > here, that my entire lifetime of life experience and
> > > training, little as it is in comparison with
> > > professionals, is untrue. Broadway is as appealing as it
> > > is to those who seek it out because it is the Broadway
> > > Community, not the perhaps revolutionistically aspired,
> > > Broadway Conglomerate. You can't take over a culture
> > > simply by declaring it non-existent.
> >
> > Do you set yourself a target each day of how much nonsense
> > you can say?
> >
> > I've never said Jim isn't who Jim is, you have
> > Mrs.Jimbles.
> >
> > I'm guessing you didn't care to read fully what I said
> > after what you did (it's difficult I know) In short I'll
> > summarise, please try and keep up:
> >
> > You claimed that having 200 investors of a show was
> > "the nature of Broadway" and I replied It might
> > be for the odd show or two, but it isn't the nature.
> >
> > Pud
> >
>
> I said having 200 investors for a large show is par for
> the course as is having numerous investors, typically more
> than 80 on the roles for one show.
>
> That phenomenon of applying investments from unrelated
> parties into a common pool is the nature of Broadway.
>
>
And it's Lady Mrs. Jimbles to you.
|
