not logged in
| re: Now you may find an example... | |
Posted by:  |
rockfenris2005 06:19 am UTC 05/19/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Now you may find an example... - Klasien 06:12 pm UTC 05/18/07 |
> First of all: beliefs are always personal, and to tell > another person that what they believe is incorrect is a > personal offence, because you attack them for what they > believe, and that hits very close to home... I don't attack them for the belief, I argue with it. That said, I don't think any mad person has beliefs because their head is not screwed on right. For all we know, one minute they could believe in cheese, next in chocolate. > > Second: if anyone wants to believe another person's > bullshit, that is their good right. Even if you know it to > be bull, he or she has the right to believe what they > want. Yeah, but it's so obvious that Jim isn't Richard O'Brien and Celine Dion and all the others. This community has accepted that for 10 years and it is damaging all of Jacqueline's hard work and making her look like a fool. It's not fair. What about her beliefs? She's not even mad > > Third: any discussion on beliefs, whether religious or not > tends to get ugly because it is hitting so close to home. I understand. > > Fourth: the fact that you find it necessary to call Susan > a psycho for posting rubbish means that you do care about > what she posts. You are personally offended by the claims > she makes because you believe them to be untrue and all > she says clashes with your beliefs and the way you > want/need your world too be. I don't attack her personally, I just attack the crap she's spreading. Logically it's still an opinion but she's completely mad. She probably doesn't even believe it herself and why should she? The evidence states otherwise. Society doesn't allow people to walk around and scream that President Bush is really the Pope. > > Fifth: I am not saying I agree with Susan or believe any > of her stories, just that she has the right to believe in > her own beliefs. Yes, she does, but she has no right to shove them down our throats 24/7 ruining JD's message-board. > > Sixth: the way you post here and the fact that I take the > time to write such a lengthy reply proves that we both > don't have a life. I just moved to a different country and > am trying to pick up the pieces, what's your excuse...?? I can write a lot in a short amount of time? > > Seventh and last: YOU DON'T NEED AN EXCUSE TO BE WHO YOU > ARE!!! just as long as you can live with yourself and can > accept other people's beliefs as their own I think you are > doing pretty well... I can do all of that but her claims are damaging. She says my claims are damaging when all I'm trying to do is stop her claims from being damaging. She's a troll, regulars like Smeghead and others all agree with that. I can't believe JD isn't banning her. She did last time. She banned Milton and Steve and AGAwesome. > > So get a life, get over yourself and Susan and don't fool > yourself... if you call a person a stupid psycho for > posting something you don't like, That's not how it was. I can't remember how it was, it's too complicated to explain, but that's not how it was. you definately are > attacking a person and not that person's actions... > unfortunately that goes for many people here... and it > only seems to make her (and others) more determined... > I'm not intending to attack anyone personally. Why is it some people see it that way? See, the complications of the internet. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Now you may find an example... - Klasien 06:12 pm UTC 05/18/07 |
| Next: | re: Now you may find an example... - pidunk 09:03 pm UTC 05/18/07 |
| Thread: | |