| re: Why the downer on Meat | |
|
Posted by: |
ricgough 12:22 pm UTC 05/22/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Why the downer on Meat - Klasien 08:34 am UTC 05/22/07 |
> True as that may be... Meat Rocks!! > > I dislike Bat III (if you can call it that) for lack of > Jim content, though even I have to admit it has a few good > songs on it... and even I have to admit that he can't sing > the way he used to... but come on people, this is Meat > Loaf we are talking about... > > His interpretation of Jim's music has been too important > to me for too long to just shove him aside, even though I > won't be likely to go see him in concert anymore... more > due to the fact that he doesn't visit Scandinavia than > anything else though. > > K. > He's always had 'off days'. some of the 70's shows have flat notes,crazy adlibs and a growly texture. I think age has accentuated imperfections already there but believe me, Newcastle on sunday was good. Have seen him before (live & T.V.)when it's been like watching a trainwreck, but his charisma and the band have pulled him through. Not bad enough to stop me and 10000 others in my town parting with 40 quid every other year though. Yes the songs are slower, yes,you never know what he'll sound like, but the shows are great and for a man of 60, who still leaves audiences exhilirated, he's still awesome!!! | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Why the downer on Meat - Klasien 01:44 pm UTC 05/22/07 |
| Next: | Newcastle videos. - Bat_out_of_Jelly_Babies 10:03 pm UTC 05/21/07 |
| Thread: | |