I always preferred the legends over the real thing.
>
> Dream Krolocks, Dream albums, Dream titles, Dream
> vocalists, Dream projects, and all of that.....it looks
> like, when the serious fans get serious, nothing is real
> at all. So, the problem with some of the most "serious"
> fans of all, may be that my dreams are more real than
> theirs? And who else exists here prepared and willing to
> ask the tough questions, that bring Jim into his best
> light? All the Rory Dodd worshippers, all the slammers of
> Jim's reputation that Jim does not comment upon himself on
> this forum....does not mean he never did to anyone,
> doesn't mean he minds someone standing up for him....in
> the spirit of it, the dichotomy between the good
> rockfenris and the evil rockfenris exists in the claims of
> Jim's interests and the actions in total that defy them. I
> still want to know what he means by copyright issues that
> were so urgent he had to call the United States from
> Australia and discuss with Jim's attorney instead of his
> own. Doesn't anyone else want to know? Who wants to know
> facts, things that could be facts, or things that should
> be facts, as opposed to things that could never be facts?
>
>
> And while we are on the subject, why doesn't Dave have his
> own blog? Why is Pudding's blog, Dave's blog?
>
> P.S. Jacqueline, on the flat mode, there is an error on
> the first sticky, where my name is shown in the second
> column ....it looks kinda funky....any chance of
> correcting that sticky so that Dave's Budapest mailing
> list announcement is untainted? Thanks very much. :)
>
>
>
>
|
