HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: What Percentage of Rockman Record is Fan Fiction?

Posted by:
Klasien 08:40 pm UTC 05/23/07
In reply to: re: What Percentage of Rockman Record is Fan Fiction? - pidunk 07:20 pm UTC 05/23/07

I did not reply to your email because I assumed then what I assume now, that you and Susan were the same person. I had no interest in corresponding with her at all and decided not to reply.
My mom taught me to be silent when I have absolutely nothing nice to say to somebody and I did.

I see too many similarities in your posts about Jim and Susan's posts on the same subject to believe there has been any change or to change my perspective on who you really are.

Seeing as you deny any affiliation with claims made by Susan earlier, I see no reason to discuss those any further, I think the board would greatly benefit from a lack of that nonsense.


K.
who knows exactly what and who she is, was and can be.

>
>
> > no you twit..
>
> (pee wee herman zone: I know what you are but what am
> I?)
.
> >I was referring to all the things you said
> > as Susan. If even half of that was true... you have been
> > taken in badly!
>
> Let's not rush to such a quick and rash judgement. See
> below:
>
>
> Klasien, all the things said as "Susan" were not said by
> me, that is the point that I have painstakingly been
> trying to make. It would be very helpful if you elucidate
> me as to which thing or things you are referring to, so
> that a genuine meeting of the minds in some semblance
> could take place. I really am not hard to communicate
> with. Honest. Verbiage excepted.
>
> I wrote to you this email on the 29th of September in 2005
> which you did not reply to:
>
>

> Hello Klasien,
>
> I have not been attempting to post on the board. That is
> a horrible mess the way it was, and there is no end in
> sight, but I have made headway into discovering traceable
> evidence of the impersonator which has been forwarded to
> authorities.
>
> I want to note that you have, even in your excited
> criticism, given a compassionate sort of treatment to me,
> in that, you first acknowledged that I was not throwing
> fits about being excluded from the hub, and then, when you
> openned your thinking to the possiblities I was
> describing.
>
> Unfortunately, you were not given the ability to be clear
> on what I was saying when the impersonator and spammers
> got in the way. Believe it or not, this is the
> characteristic of my life with Jim, we have been
> interfered with for a long time in severe ways.
>
> I was wondering if you would be willing to correspond with
> me, to continue our, such as it may have potentiated to
> be, discussion of the various informations I brought
> about.
>
> I would not suggest that you mention to the board that you
> are corresponding with me, else I am afraid that
> impersonations and spam may ensue, which if it does in any
> event, I ask you please notify me of that. I hope that
> this circumstance may clear up soon.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Susan
>

>
>
> There is alot of obsfucation, things deliberately being
> confused, being retold wrongly, being told falsely by
> others beside myself. If I am ever in the wrong it is when
> my own understanding is not honed. As it is of course I
> know much more now than I did then, but there was so much
> stuff there that was garbage that I did not write, but was
> written by someone as "Susan". Please, even if you
> continue to keep your opinion, suspend it long enough to
> be fair, and ask the detailed questions. People keep
> promising to expose me, but all they do is cover me in
> shrouds.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >
> > > Even if only half the things you've said
> > > > are true, than why has he left you out here alone? To be
> > > > ridiculed by the only people that should matter to him
> > > > according to you? To be bannished by his own fans? I have
> > > > a hard time accepting that a man who writes with such
> > > > passion could be so heartless.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't paint by numbers, so I really don't know what
> > > paragraph relates to what. And, I really need specifics
> > > from you if I am to understand what you mean. How can I
> > > say what you think you have heard is wrong, if you only
> > > call them by vague references? AND+ If people choose to
> > > ridicule, banish me, whatever, it is not Jim's doing, and
> > > it is someone else doing it. The lack of humanity in his
> > > small selection of maniacs does not make him responsible
> > > for them You want him to be the guilty ONE? How absurd
> > > and cruel!!!!!
> > >
> > >
> > >


reply |

Previous: re: What Percentage of Rockman Record is Fan Fiction? - pidunk 07:20 pm UTC 05/23/07
Next: re: What Percentage of Rockman Record is Fan Fiction? - pidunk 09:08 pm UTC 05/23/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE