Considering the result was a very tiny Angel that doesn't intrude one way or the other, its clearly a compromise to appease the conflicting briefs that he was given.
Other than aesthetic impact, I doubt he would have had an opinion one way or the other on whether the angel was actually present in the design, just where the angel can or can't be.
>
>
> > > Here is the question I have most: What did Michael care
> > if
> > > he drew an angel or not?
> >
> > He didn't you stupid twat, Meat Loaf did, learn to read.
> >
>
> Well, sanctimonious prick, I did, and you gave yourself
> away that you can. I stand corrected. So then the question
> is for Meatloaf I guess, but I think that Whelan had an
> issue which spurred the dialogue...just a guess, but he
> seems to favor dark angels or dragons in general. Maybe he
> did have a prob.
>
>
>
>
|
