HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: You Do Not Need To Be Told What You Already Know

Posted by:
pidunk 07:16 am UTC 06/01/07
In reply to: re: You Do Not Need To Be Told What You Already Know - Pudding 07:14 am UTC 06/01/07



>
>
> >
> >
> > > I don't think Jim need make a judgement on every banning.
> > > The President of the United States does not make a
> > > decision every time someone gets a speeding ticket.
> >
> > I'm inclined to think he'd have something to say about the
> > board because he reads it. I'm also inclined to think he'd
> > have something to say about what may be a status for a
> > friend, even a friend not so significant as myself.
>
>
> I think Jim would tell you to FUCK OFF like everyone else
> you've ever come in contact with.


Actually, you and the others on the internet are the only ones who tell me to f*off. My Jim would rather I f*on.






reply |

Previous: re: You Do Not Need To Be Told What You Already Know - Pudding 07:14 am UTC 06/01/07
Next: re: You Do Not Need To Be Told What You Already Know - Pudding 08:42 pm UTC 06/01/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE