| re: what is the problem w/ pidpunk??? | |
|
Posted by: |
Leesa (gallytrotter@mchsi.com) 10:21 pm UTC 06/01/07 |
| In reply to: | re: what is the problem w/ pidpunk??? - fallingtofly 08:58 pm UTC 06/01/07 |
| Fallingtofly, you've pretty much nailed it. You can ask some of the longest contributers here (if they recall that far back)about what a zealot I am about free speech message boards (got me in trouble!) and why that certainly contributes to this being something of a sacred space of sorts to me. And I know that both JD and Jim have that same belief--sort of the anti-Meat Fan Club attitude, which many of us here do take pride in being banned from!! It was really hard for Jacqueline to finally agree to kick Susan off the first time as the Rockman had weathered so many other troll types without moderation; usually kids under 16, I should think. Alot of them even stuck around, turned around, and became some of our most interesting contributers. They just needed to acquire some decorum and mores in regards to their expression of their opinions--i.e., how not to piss everybody off constantly!--so there's a ton of merit in hesitating to ban someone here. And that was all good. This was really different. This individual has consistantly presented many symptoms of dementia (my father in law suffered from it for years) and maybe even schizophrenia (which a good friend of mine has and who behaves very much like Susan does here when she goes off her meds). She's really more delusional and uses this format and us to feed these fantasies--which doctors will tell you is the worst thing we can do for her. I read some of the past posts she had this spring and for a while she did seem reasonable and perhaps deserved a chance. But I don't think it's gonna work in the long haul.I don't see her as an 'average fan'--she's very much a stalker/Mark Chapman persona and is probably as potentially dangerous now as she seemed the last time we went through this. I guess I wouldn't even hesitate. She's the reason we had to change formats in the first place and I'd boot her. John Lennon would have been better off without a fan like Mark Chapman. Cheers! Leesa Fallingtofly wrote: > And gods forbid you A)disagree with her B)agree with the > masses that she's a loon or C)simply ignore her. > > And since the mods are apparently on a permanent mental > vacation I have absolutely nothing to lose by saying > this- > IMNSHO: > She is a sick-minded individual who fantasizes about > prepubescent sex and couplings- child brides and grooms. > Her fantasy of a "commitment" and "engagement" to Jim as > a child, her constant attempt to make a commentary on the > NATURAL and ORDINARY games children play while building > social interaction with the opposite sex into something > dirty and perverted, show this. > > She's a stalker of the worst type- the kind who will feed > upon her own vanity in order to continue her stalking > behaviours. In answering herself, she is actually > answering arguments she BELIEVES come from those of us > ignoring her. > > She's a degenerate and indigent individual, as displayed > by her own commentaries on her inability to keep a job. > Notice, in that diatribe, that she consistently blames her > termination on others while trying to play the "poor me" > card. > > She's not going to be a problem much longer. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: what is the problem w/ pidpunk??? - fallingtofly 08:58 pm UTC 06/01/07 |
| Next: | re: what is the problem w/ pidpunk??? - fallingtofly 01:19 am UTC 06/03/07 |
| Thread: |
|