| re: what is the problem w/ pidpunk??? | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 04:15 am UTC 06/02/07 |
| In reply to: | re: what is the problem w/ pidpunk??? - Leesa 07:03 pm UTC 06/01/07 |
> The last time (quite some time ago) she appeared on this > board virtually every thread on ANYTHING was hijacked by > her Au contraire, hijacked FROM me. >and descended into endless rambling posts replying to > herself, sometimes 30 times or more a day- It was all the regular posters or one enterprising one, who without authentication, used the freedom to hide my worth of contribution. They impersonated me mercilessly. >-I know some of > us were counting... Unlike most trolls, ignoring her > didn't work--she just proceeded to fill the entire Rockman > with spam nonsense and prohibited any real dialogue. That was not me. >Her > conversations with herself became more and more ridiculous > until virtually all of us longterm fans told JD that we > were out until something was put in place to contain the > situation. No, it happened that on my first appearance someone decided they knew me and were going to make another board. So two boards coincided: this one, and the one where people spoke of me. >This new board was it, with at least some > moderation as opposed to the original where we just > policed ourselves. This new board originated one and a half years after the episode in question which is a period of six weeks from July 24th, 2005 to September 3, 2005. At the end it was I who made the important request for the initiation of authentication on the board. Then I did not post any more, because I was doing research on what had taken place during those six weeks. I found evidence of at least one person making a site on an Australian ISP (not under rockfenris) called "Portrait Of Susan" which had the same nonsensical pattern of repetitions of my name as had been on the board during that time. To be me, during those six weeks, was hellish. And I do not mean that in a poetic Steinmanesque metaphoric way. > This person is akin to a Mark Chapman in my mind and the > only reason in the nearly 10 yrs of its existance the > board had to be reformatted to remove problematic > posters. The fact that there is a Mark Chapman in your mind, as opposed to a Mark David Chapman, and was in your mind hours before the media released the information, is important for me to keep note of in my thinking of you. The reformat was so that I would not be impersonated. > Guess we'll see if it works... > Cheers! > Leesa > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: what is the problem w/ pidpunk??? - Leesa 07:03 pm UTC 06/01/07 |
| Next: | re: what is the problem w/ pidpunk??? - Pudding 04:36 am UTC 06/02/07 |
| Thread: |
|