not logged in
| re: WHO'S THE BIGGER FOOL? THE FOOL OR THE FOOL WHO FOLLOWS | |
Posted by:  |
Venom 06:52 am UTC 06/03/07 |
| In reply to: | re: WHO'S THE BIGGER FOOL? THE FOOL OR THE FOOL WHO FOLLOWS - pidunk 05:45 am UTC 06/03/07 |
| Pudding doesn't need to apologize to the board. Nor is it he who should leave. You're insane and the way you address others has recently bordered on harassment. Even when people ignore you, you try to provoke them. Are you not the least bit curious how I know your record in a psychiatric hospital before? I'll let you wonder about that, but I will say it defiantly looks like you will be going there again sooner than you think. I guess the only good part about you posting your hysterics publicly is that they served as evidence that you need help. Despite everything I've said, I sincerely hope they help you. > > > > > > > Criticizing someone isn't the same as punishing someone, > > You don't know the difference between criticism and > punishment. Punishment is when you cause someone to suffer > for a perceived or actual sin, punishment is when you > cause others to suffer for perceived or actual sins of > another, and punishment is what you are doling out. You > may not use the word, but it applies in every sense. You > are throwing the pixel equivalent of a temper tantrum. > > > > > > my dictionary works just fine. > > Then by all means, use it. > > > > If by way of getting rid of you means I have to impose a > > little trash, then so be it, it's a means to an end, > > > The twisted logic somehow works for you? So be it, but > know it for what it is. There is simply no sense to your > sense of purpose, and it is really a form of intellectual > terrorism. Why do I use such a strong analogy? Because you > intend it to be unpleasant, you threaten the > unpleasantness if a certain demand is not met and you > deliver the unpleasantness when the condition arises. The > effect you want is to bring submission to your demands by > the pain you cause which you claim is initiated by my > presence, and rather than leave, you choose to bring this > air of intellectual terrorism to the board. It is > intentional, it is known, with a designed goal in mind, > and the suffering is the means to the end. > > > > the > > end of you. And if I get banned too, then that's just fine > > with me. > > The first "suicide-poster". Your martyrdom does not make > you seem impressive, but your behavior makes you seem > forboding. > > > > > The bigger picture here is long term harmony, and whilst > > you're living and breathing on this board, > > I won't draw from this obvious analogy....living and > breathing is more apropos, isn't it, because obviously my > presence is not wanted, no matter what I write. It is me, > not my content, that you object to. And you are proposing > aggression as a means to gain passivity. Harmony is just > your misplaced euphemism. > > > > > > that aint ever > > going to happen. I know it, you know it and every single > > member of this forum knows it, > > Where do you come off commenting on behalf of more than > two hundred people? > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: WHO'S THE BIGGER FOOL? THE FOOL OR THE FOOL WHO FOLLOWS - pidunk 05:45 am UTC 06/03/07 |
| Next: | re: WHO'S THE BIGGER FOOL? THE FOOL OR THE FOOL WHO FOLLOWS - pidunk 12:10 pm UTC 06/03/07 |
| Thread: |
|