| re: WHO'S THE BIGGER FOOL? THE FOOL OR THE FOOL WHO FOLLOWS | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 12:15 pm UTC 06/03/07 |
| In reply to: | re: WHO'S THE BIGGER FOOL? THE FOOL OR THE FOOL WHO FOLLOWS - Pudding 05:56 am UTC 06/03/07 |
> > The first "suicide-poster". Your martyrdom does not make > > you seem impressive, but your behavior makes you seem > > forboding. > > Since I'm not on medication that whole sentence doesn't > make much sense. Then perhaps you need medication. Or a good English course. > > > I won't draw from this obvious analogy....living and > > breathing is more apropos, isn't it, because obviously my > > presence is not wanted, no matter what I write. It is me, > > not my content, that you object to. And you are proposing > > aggression as a means to gain passivity. Harmony is just > > your misplaced euphemism. > > It is your content not you, but since your content is > generally about you and your delusional bullshit, it's > difficult to seperate one from the other. You show your own psychosis by insisting that I have one. You could not validly state such a thing, and would not, if you had a sense of social proportion. > > > Where do you come off commenting on behalf of more than > > two hundred people? > > I'll rephrase it. Name 2 people on this forum who wants > you and your psychosis to stay? I don't have a psychosis, but if I did, nobody would want that to stay. Those who care about me wish health and happiness to me. > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: WHO'S THE BIGGER FOOL? THE FOOL OR THE FOOL WHO FOLLOWS - Pudding 05:56 am UTC 06/03/07 |
| Next: | re: WHO'S THE BIGGER FOOL? THE FOOL OR THE FOOL WHO FOLLOWS - Pudding 10:37 pm UTC 06/03/07 |
| Thread: |
|