re: Jim blogged | |
Posted by: |
Pudding 11:47 pm UTC 12/28/06 |
In reply to: | re: Jim blogged - rockfenris2005 08:35 pm UTC 12/28/06 |
> > > > > Hmm, it almost confirms my theory doesn't it. I know > > > you'll say no, but Jim (in that entry) again implies that > > > it's a Rinkoff production. > > > > That isn't a theory at all, since numerous different > > people on the board time and time again, have said it's > > Rinkoff's baby. > > > > Pud > > If numerous people said it, I said it first. My memory on > THAT is crystal clear You've been on the egg-nog again haven't you? Justin's said it's mainly Rinkoff's project, so has Smeg and I have on several occasions, plus several others have also. You might think you've said it first because you don't bother reading other people's posts properly, but I can assure you, your little theory isn't a theory at all and you most definitely wasn't first. Pud | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Jim blogged - rockfenris2005 08:35 pm UTC 12/28/06 |
Next: | re: Jim blogged - rockfenris2005 12:00 am UTC 12/29/06 |
Thread: |
|