HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim blogged

Posted by:
Pudding 11:47 pm UTC 12/28/06
In reply to: re: Jim blogged - rockfenris2005 08:35 pm UTC 12/28/06



>
>
> > > Hmm, it almost confirms my theory doesn't it. I know
> > > you'll say no, but Jim (in that entry) again implies that
> > > it's a Rinkoff production.
> >
> > That isn't a theory at all, since numerous different
> > people on the board time and time again, have said it's
> > Rinkoff's baby.
> >
> > Pud
>
> If numerous people said it, I said it first. My memory on
> THAT is crystal clear

You've been on the egg-nog again haven't you?

Justin's said it's mainly Rinkoff's project, so has Smeg and I have on several occasions, plus several others have also.

You might think you've said it first because you don't bother reading other people's posts properly, but I can assure you, your little theory isn't a theory at all and you most definitely wasn't first.

Pud


reply |

Previous: re: Jim blogged - rockfenris2005 08:35 pm UTC 12/28/06
Next: re: Jim blogged - rockfenris2005 12:00 am UTC 12/29/06

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE