re: Jim Autograph - Thread inspired by Markus! | |
Posted by: ![]() |
daveake 07:57 am UTC 06/08/07 |
In reply to: | re: Jim Autograph - Thread inspired by Markus! - pidunk 07:26 am UTC 06/08/07 |
Mostly correct. I noticed you comment to the pic, said "Oh bugger" and decided that, rather than keep blocking you each time your IP changes, I'd block your ISP out. I was trying to avoid it, as there's a chance I'm now blocking out someone else, but I don't believe that's the case. However I don't have time to keep adding your latest IP address range nor do I have time for the endless threads that ensue when you find something to comment on. Dave > > For those of you who don't know, Dave, who has his own > ability to block access to his server, blocks my IP on a > semi-regular basis. This means that when my ISP has me on > the IP that was blocked, I can't access any of Dave's > files, including photos posted from there on this board, > to see it or download it along with the rest of you. When > the IP is differently assigned by my ISP, I manage to gain > access and am able to listen to the music he hosts, > download the files he hosts, and see the photos he posts > his links to. Now, it happened this evening that my IP had > not been blocked, and I saw the photo. And my comments of > it have spurred Dave to widen the block to my entire ISP, > so that people who also use the same ISP as me, even if > they are miles away from me, cannot view Dave's photos, > download his files, or listen to the music he hosts. He > learns my IP by looking at the stats he gets reported, so > when he looked this evening at the accessors to the photo, > he got my recent IP, and in a fit of frustration, blocked > the whole ISP. Why? > > He says it is because he does not want to give me material > for my "crazy theories" paraphrase, and at this juncture, > I was being highly complimentary and supportive to him. > But, it did not matter to him. Maybe he was bothered that > I noticed Jim's IXOYE on the autograph. > > > > > Stop fishing. > > > > Dave > > > > p.s. your entire ISP is now blocked, just to stop any more > > fish slipping through the net. > > > > > > > > Did he happen to mention that he was adding the IXOYE? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Methinks it's not going anywhere near ebay :-) > > > > > > > > I agree. Something as splendid as this should be kept in > > > > your collection. If I had this I would never sell it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Methinks this would cause a bidding war on Ebay! > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is my favourite. This was at the March '06 TDE > > > > > > > shows. On the first night I took a photo of Jim and > > > > > > > Bonnie embracing, then on the second night I took a print > > > > > > > of the photo and asked both Bonnie and Jim to sign the > > > > > > > back. The pic here is a frame with the back of that photo > > > > > > > next to another print of the same photo. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ![]() | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Jim Autograph - Thread inspired by Markus! - pidunk 07:26 am UTC 06/08/07 |
Next: | re: Jim Autograph - Thread inspired by Markus! - pidunk 07:13 am UTC 06/08/07 |
Thread: |