not logged in
| re: NJC: Some Deep Thoughts from Insomnia | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 07:55 am UTC 06/22/07 |
| In reply to: | NJC: Some Deep Thoughts from Insomnia - Venom 06:52 am UTC 06/19/07 |
Venom, you aww shitting me up there? Silly boy, I agree with you! Now you know you've been without too much sleep. You remind me of one of my co-workers. > I don't usually post something as odd as this, but lately > I've had insomnia and have had some very disturbing > questions come up in my inner thoughts. It has nothing to > do with Steinman, but as this is a Steinman community and > it is within Jim that we come together as a community, I > am curious what the opinions are of others here who share > my likes. > > Here it goes. I like Science. I like explaining things > through Science. But the idea of finality of existance > disturbs me. I knew theories like the bing bang had a > beginning and thus everything known would one day not > exist. > > Then it hit me. Science and the rules of science are > relative to only the rules we were given of what we know. > We know about gravity, we know about natural elements, we > know about energy, and we know about space. Scientists use > these rules to debunk any thoughts of the possibility of > anything unnatural. This within itself seems pretty > stupid. Why? Where did gravity get it's rules? What set > the rules to dictate how gravity should work? They say > matter is created from energy originating back to the big > bang, but where did energy itself originate from? What > dictates energy how to work and the rules it must follow > to do what it does? What exists beyond the reaches of > space itself and within what did the big bang itself exist > within? If the big bang created existence, then what lay > before existence? > > Simple. It is an eternal state. The rules of Science > itself have no definable origin. Our human minds do not > comprehend any true answers. Scientists think they > comprehend by utilizing science's rules, but in the end, > they actually know very little. They were given , without > any definable origin, a set of rules to play by. In the > end it kind of sounds like for every scientific rule there > must exist an anti-scientific method to create it. No > matter how much we discover, it's only a small, > easy-to-understand fraction of a concept that is beyond > our ability to comprehend. If you study science deep > enough and long enough it will force you to believe in the > unnatural. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | NJC: Some Deep Thoughts from Insomnia - Venom 06:52 am UTC 06/19/07 |
| Next: | re: NJC: Some Deep Thoughts from Insomnia - GTKarber 10:26 am UTC 06/22/07 |
| Thread: |
|