re: Bad For Good (the song) | |
Posted by: ![]() |
pidunk 08:08 am UTC 06/22/07 |
In reply to: | Bad For Good (the song) - Wilbury 06:27 am UTC 06/16/07 |
> It's just hit me that I wish Bad For Good was on Bat 2. My > reasons for thinking this are two fold: I don't like it that any of the songs on BFG got put onto Bat2. I couldn't believe it when I saw it, I thought what the fuck is this, repeating the same songs? What kind of crap is that? Meat Loaf has to have his beef and gravy too? What the hell was that all about? BFG was what it was, and that was all. And somebody please, PLEASE tell me, why are discographies I find for Meat's Dead Ringer, coming up with release year of 1981? Hate me all the shit you want, but answer me about that. Or I'll call you weenies. > > 1. it sounds ACE on the Lost Boys and Golden Girls tour > (as does the song Lost Boys itself). Ace wasn't on the Lost Boys and Golden Girls tour, he must have been lost. > > 2. But more importantly, the bat 2 version of Frying Pan > makes the original look and sound PUNY in comparison. If you had the imagination I have, you would KNOW how bold and amazing Frying Pan was, is, and always will be on BFG. >And > I really like the original, I think it's great. But the > Bat 2 version makes it sound wimpy. I'll gladly pay you tuesday for a hamburger I eat today. >Imagine if Jim could > have done the same thing with BfG!! It would be the most > unbelievale thing to hear! > Unbelievable! You didn't tell me you wanted something unbelievable! > > And LASTLY (as an added bonus), if BfG HAD been recorded > for Bat 2, Desmond would never have had the chance to fuck > it up!! :o) Liet motifs are one thing but crapful recycles of actual songs over and over in a wild desperation to claim ground upon which no claim exists is a cheap shot. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | Bad For Good (the song) - Wilbury 06:27 am UTC 06/16/07 |
Next: | re: Bad For Good (the song) - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 04:15 pm UTC 06/27/07 |
Thread: |
|