You've made my point for me, thankyou. If you go in and they diagnose low blood sugar, why do they then starve you for 72 hours? Low blood sugar + nothing for 72 hours = no more pidunk.
Dave
>
>
> > Well, I'm confused then, because you said you were
> > admitted with suspected congestive heart failure. If
> > instead you went in with low blood sugar, they're hardly
> > likely to starve you for 72 hours to see when you drop
> > dead.
> >
> > On the other hand ...
> >
> Your reading comprehension is a bit on the less than
> efficient side: I feared congestive heart failure when I
> was a couple of miles from the hospital. I was found to
> have low blood sugar in the hospital itself. I was not
> experiencing the heart failure simultaniously with the
> hypoglycemic episode because there were eighteen hours
> between them. Apparently I did not have a congestive heart
> failure as I had feared, which was a relief to me.
> However, congestive heart failure is not a condition that
> stays, it is a condition that is more like a status of
> heart efficiency, rather than a cardiac arrest, however,
> acute congestive heart failure can lead to cardiac arrest.
>
>
>
|
