| re: Jacqueline. A question for you. |
|
Posted by:
 |
stewbeef 08:12 pm UTC 08/23/07 |
| In reply to: |
Jacqueline. A question for you. - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 07:08 pm UTC 08/23/07 |
|
we dont think your not educated your just lazy when it comes to spelling.hit the spell checker.
> Have you at all asked Susan to stop her lies. BEcause I
> have been considering(Not that anyone here cares) about
> slipping into lerker mode until she stops. Before she was
> amusing. But then she started making jibes at me, saying I
> am not educated. How dare she start saying shit like that
> all because she dose not agree with my posts. How can you
> allow this to happen. And its not just me. Lessa has
> complained about how Susan claims to know her. Smeghead
> siad were all Susan lovers. Well Im not and Im sorry he
> left. Only a few people here( Pudiing,to name but one)
> Still talk sense. Its as though this board is changin to
> acomadate Susans ramblings. Which isnt fair. I came here
> to talk about the works of Jim Stienman. But it seems most
> people here are distressed by Susan so much there leaving.
> But the most unfortunate thing about it os. That Susanm
> dosent go away to a bigger community. She posts on You
> tube(Susan, torchwood11 right here) and refers to Susan in
> the third person. Claiming to be someone else.(Its the
> smae person. They Spout the crap) So. PLease tell her to
> stop. And maybe will have more active threads. rarthe then
> the ghost town we have at the present
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
Conspiracy time - Pudding 10:25 pm UTC 08/23/07 |
| Next: |
re: Jacqueline. A question for you. - Klasien 05:52 am UTC 08/24/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|