| re: Jacqueline. A question for you. |
|
Posted by:
 |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 09:31 pm UTC 08/23/07 |
| In reply to: |
re: Jacqueline. A question for you. - stewbeef 08:12 pm UTC 08/23/07 |
|
Im not saying you guys have said anything bad. Im just not enjoying the board as much now cause half of us have jumped ship cause of Susan
> we dont think your not educated your just lazy when it
> comes to spelling.hit the spell checker.
>
> > Have you at all asked Susan to stop her lies. BEcause I
> > have been considering(Not that anyone here cares) about
> > slipping into lerker mode until she stops. Before she was
> > amusing. But then she started making jibes at me, saying I
> > am not educated. How dare she start saying shit like that
> > all because she dose not agree with my posts. How can you
> > allow this to happen. And its not just me. Lessa has
> > complained about how Susan claims to know her. Smeghead
> > siad were all Susan lovers. Well Im not and Im sorry he
> > left. Only a few people here( Pudiing,to name but one)
> > Still talk sense. Its as though this board is changin to
> > acomadate Susans ramblings. Which isnt fair. I came here
> > to talk about the works of Jim Stienman. But it seems most
> > people here are distressed by Susan so much there leaving.
> > But the most unfortunate thing about it os. That Susanm
> > dosent go away to a bigger community. She posts on You
> > tube(Susan, torchwood11 right here) and refers to Susan in
> > the third person. Claiming to be someone else.(Its the
> > smae person. They Spout the crap) So. PLease tell her to
> > stop. And maybe will have more active threads. rarthe then
> > the ghost town we have at the present
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Jacqueline. A question for you. - Klasien 03:25 pm UTC 08/25/07 |
| Next: |
re: Jacqueline. A question for you. - Evil_One 08:36 pm UTC 08/23/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|